Anonymous hacks Italy’s critical-national-IT protection

July 25th, 2011

Evidently the protection isn’t critical

By John LeydenGet more from this author

Hacktivists have posted “secret documents” stolen from an Italian cybercrime unit.

The documents – 8GB of files – were extracted from a system maintained by the Centro Nazionale Anticrimine Informatico per la Protezione delle Infrastrutture Critiche (CNAIPIC), the organisation charged with guarding the country’s critical IT infrastructure. In a message on Twitter announcing the release, Anonymous said it had received the files from an unnamed “source”, prior to posting a sample of the files onto Pastebin. “#AntiSec strikes at Italy Government. Silent no more,” it said.

The stolen documents reportedly include confidential data stored on servers that held evidence related to investigations as well as documents on the management structure of CNAIPIC and pictures of staff, among other files. Data on private firms including Gazprom and Exxon Mobil as well as foreign governments also appears to be among the cache.

Anonymous makes no direct mention on the motive for the attack, but it may well have been a retaliation to the arrests of alleged members of Anonymous in Italy earlier this month.

A story on the release can be found on The Hacker News here.

Hackers affiliated with the AntiSec movement have also hit GIS Austria, the Austrian TV licence fee collector. The organisation said 214,000 data files were swiped from its systems by Anonymous on Friday and that 96,000 of these had contained “account information”. The hack is under investigation and affected customers have been informed. GIS’s statement can be found here (in German). ®

Macs prone to hacking via battery —Report

July 25th, 2011

Are the batteries in Apple Inc.’s laptops too smart for their own good?

Security researcher Charlie Miller has found a potential security weakness that potentially allows a hacker to take control of a MacBook – or even have it explode.

“These batteries just aren’t designed with the idea that people will mess with them. What I’m showing is that it’s possible to use them to do something really bad,” Miller said, according to a blog post on Forbes.com.

Miller is currently a researcher with the consultancy Accuvant, Forbes said.

Laptop batteries contain a microcontroller that monitors the power level and lets the laptop’s operating system and charger respond appropriately.

Such microcontrollers can even regulate the heat they generate.

But Miller said that when he examined batteries in several Macbooks, Macbook Pros and Macbook Airs, he found the batteries’ chips are shipped with default passwords.

Potentially, he said anyone who discovers that password and learns to control the chips’ firmware can use the batteries to hack into the MacBooks.

Miller said he plans to expose and provide a fix for a potential attack using the microchips that control their batteries, at a Black Hat security conference in August.

That includes “permanently ruining batteries at will, and may enable nastier tricks like implanting them with hidden malware that infects the computer no matter how many times software is reinstalled or even potentially causing the batteries to heat up, catch fire or explode,” Forbes said.

He also said he plans to release a tool for Apple users, “Caulkgun,” that changes the battery firmware’s passwords to a random string.

Miller also sent Apple and Texas Instruments his research to inform them of the vulnerability, although he has yet to get a reply from Apple.

“No one has ever thought of this as a security boundary,” says Miller. “It’s hard to know for sure everything someone could do with this.”

Criminal potential

Forbes quoted Miller as saying one can install persistent malware on the chip that infects the rest of the computer to steal data, control its functions, or cause it to crash.

“You could put a whole hard drive in, reinstall the software, flash the BIOS, and every time it would reattack and screw you over. There would be no way to eradicate or detect it other than removing the battery,” he said.

He said few IT administrators would think to check a battery’s firmware for the source of that infection.

Worse, the chip could re-infect the computer again and again if it is not discovered.

Blowing up

Forbes said that the disturbing prospect of a hacker remotely blowing up a battery on command may be possible.

Miller said that while the batteries he examined have safeguards against explosions, having a battery blow up on command might still be possible.

“You read stories about batteries in electronic devices that blow up without any interference. If you have all this control, you can probably do it,” he said.

Analyzing software updates

Miller discovered two passwords in accessing and altering Apple batteries by analyzing a software update Apple instituted in 2009 to address a problem with Macbook batteries.

He reverse-engineered the firmware and found how to rewrite the firmware to do whatever he wanted. — TJD, GMA News

Credit: http://www.gmanews.tv/story/227329/technology/macs-prone-to-hacking-via-battery-report

Read about hacks? Think you’re immune? Think again

July 7th, 2011

(Reuters) – While the big news is about hacks into the CIA’s and Senate’s public websites, Citigroup and Lockheed Martin, tens of thousands of people are victimized by cyber criminals each year, sometimes with devastating effect.

The FBI, which has a special Internet fraud center, received more than 25,000 complaints a month last year from people who were defrauded over the Internet by fake companies which offered to sell goods that never arrived, by people whose identities were stolen and by victims scammed by someone who claimed to be an FBI agent.

Victims lost hundreds of millions of dollars, according to the FBI’s Internet fraud report for 2010.

The conventional view of hackers as pimply faced, isolated young men out to harmlessly joyride some big company’s servers is out of date, despite the presence of groups such as Anonymous and Lulz Security, which strike for fun and political reasons.

The more worrisome hackers are crime rings in Asia and Eastern Europe or elsewhere beyond the easy reach of the law, where hackers may use a wireless connection in a Russian library to avoid detection.

These are the individuals who steal personal information, like names, addresses, dates of birth and email addresses. They then sell that information to thieves in Internet chat rooms. Those thieves often round out what they know about victims from Facebook pages — maybe a birthplace from a Facebook quiz — or other social media.

Maybe they’ll send a phishing email, pretending to know the victims. Or maybe they’ll send them something they might like because they have found out, for example, that they have a Sony PlayStation and were born in 1943.

But that game download for a grandchild could include key-logging software that secretly tells thieves what victims type. Perhaps they’ll use that to find out which banks they use, and their user names and passwords.

Some advice:

_ Limit information on Facebook and other social media. “Citizens need to start recognizing the value of their own personal data and not put out any data that isn’t necessary,” said U.S. Representative Jim Langevin, a co-founder of the Congressional Cyber Security Caucus.

_ Have solid Internet computer security software and update it monthly. Word to the wise: porn sites are notoriously loaded with viruses.

“Don’t click on links in spam messages and be extra suspicious of messages that piggyback on recent hot news items or events such as holidays,” says Joris Evers, a spokesman for McAfee Inc.

_ Some security experts advise against clicking in links in any email, no matter what the source.

_ Use strong passwords, which means a password that is long and has a mix of letters, numbers and symbols. A strong password is especially important for financial transactions.

Jim Lewis, a cyber expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said he does frequent sweeps of his computer using different security software.

“I do not use computers that my children use for my financial transactions,” said Lewis. “I change passwords and user names very frequently, not that that’s perfect.”

There are efforts to combat spam and phishing attacks.

Many Internet service providers identify and stop spam — estimated to be 90 percent of Internet traffic — before it reaches an inbox. But they only get a percentage.

Comcast, a major Internet service provider, reaches out to customers who have been contacted by potential criminals to warn them, said Jay Opperman, Comcast’s senior director of security and privacy.

“Our customers are very happy with the fact that we’re proactive,” he said. “Overwhelmingly, they’re like ‘Wow, I didn’t know. Thanks for letting me know.’”

TDL-4: The ‘indestructible’ botnet?

June 30th, 2011

Security researchers at Kaspersky Lab have detailed a new botnet–a collection of infected computers controlled by cybercriminals–called TDL-4, that might just be “indestructible.”

TDL-4 gets its name by being the fourth generation of the botnet. In 2008, the original TDL appeared. It has been altered over the last several years. With TDL-4, Kaspersky has found, the malware creators have drastically improved the botnet over its predecessors.

“The malware writers extended the program functionality, changed the algorithm used to encrypt the communication protocol between bots and the botnet command and control servers, and attempted to ensure they had access to infected computers even in cases where the botnet control centers are shut down,” Kaspersky wrote on its SecureList blog earlier this week. “The owners of TDL are essentially trying to create an ‘indestructible’ botnet that is protected against attacks, competitors, and antivirus companies.”

Central to TDL-4′s updates is an improved algorithm that encrypts communications between infected computers and the botnet’s command. According to Kaspersky, TDL-4 creates an identifier known as “bsh parameter” that “acts as one of the encryption keys for subsequent connections to the command and control server.” Once a request between command and the computer is activated, it’s transmitted over an HTTPS connection. According to Kaspersky, that system helps the botnet “run smoothly” and, at the same time, stops anyone else from trying to take control over it.

Global distribution of TDL-4 infections.Global distribution of TDL-4 infections. According to the country codes to the right, the U.S., India, Indonesia, and Great Britain are tops in infections, according to Kaspersky.

(Credit: Kaspersky Lab)

To help safeguard itself from removal, TDL-4 infects a computer’s master boot record, thus allowing it to run before the operating system starts up, and keep it away from the prying eyes of anti-malware programs. What’s more, the botnet deletes other malicious files that might get caught by security tools and tip users to TDL-4 running on their computers. In their place, TDL-4 has downloaded about 30 malicious programs on infected computers, including “fake anti-virus programs, adware, and the Pushdo spambot,” Kaspersky says.

According to Kaspersky, the botnet also uses peer-to-peer network Kad to issue several commands, including searching for new files, publishing files to Kad, and more.

The big upshot of that for TDL-4 creators, Kaspersky says, is that even if “its command and control centers are shut down, the botnet owners will not lose control over infected machines,” since they’ll still be able to access Kad.

Although Kaspersky believes TDL-4 is practically impenetrable, not everyone is so quick to agree. Writing for InfoWorld today, Roger Grimes, a self-described “24-year veteran of the malware wars,” says that there has yet to be a single threat that has been able to hold its ground indefinitely.

“I can safely tell you that no threat has appeared that the antimalware industry and OS vendors did not successfully respond to,” Grimes writes. “It may take months or years to kill off something, but eventually the good guys get it right.”

He makes a solid point. Last year, Conficker was taken down after wreaking havoc on computers worldwide since 2008. Earlier this month, the FBI announced that it had taken down the Coreflood botnet.

But TDL-4′s functionality might just be in a league of its own. As Kaspersky notes, the botnet can “manipulate adware and search engines, provide anonymous Internet access, and act as a launch pad for other malware.”

According to Kaspersky, 28 percent of all infected TDL-4 computers are in the U.S. Computers in the U.K., Italy, France, and many other countries are also infected with TDL-4. All told, more than 4.5 million computers were infected with TDL-4 in the first three months of 2011 alone.

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, posting at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

How AVG keeps your computer safe

June 24th, 2011

June 24, 2011 8:00 AM PDT

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20073682-83/how-avg-keeps-your-computer-safe/#ixzz1QD3Ec0yAAVG’s virus lab is centered in Brno, Czech Republic.

(Credit: Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

The city of Brno in the Czech Republic is a place people go to learn. Situated some 130 miles southeast of Prague, its 11 universities host approximately 80,000 students, many of whom are computer engineers. So it’s no surprise that while AVG’s corporate offices are headquartered back in Prague, Brno hosts the lifeblood of the company: the virus lab.

Although consumer computer security has grown tremendously in the past five years–with nearly all the major security suite makers including some form of community-based protection, URL verification, or phishing prevention to accompany more traditional tools like firewalls and antispam measures–antivirus detection remains the quintessential PC security feature.

AVG’s Brno office is located in an complex that also hosts computer security vendorTrustPort, as well as a home appliance manufacturer. In most ways, the AVG offices on the sixth floor could be the offices of any software company. There’s a game room with foosball and table hockey; a small library with muted lighting; a playroom for the children of AVG employees; and relaxation spaces designed to resemble places not often seen in the heart of central Europe, like beaches festooned with hammocks. The walls of one of the eating areas has been painted to resemble a Starbucks, complete with a massive Starbucks logo.

 

Two floors down, the only indications that you’ve arrived at the virus lab are the raft of warnings plastered to the door. Yellow caution tape and printed flyers emblazoned with the biohazard icon make the lab stand out from the rest of the conference rooms and offices. Of course, computer viruses have yet to actually pose a threat to your biological health, but the point is clear: The lab is restricted. Omezený, in Czech.

Inside, security analysts sit in high-backed chairs at Dell computers running Windows 7, and except for what’s being displayed on their screens, the scene again returns to one of abject normality. The work that they’re doing, however, is of paramount importance to your computer’s security.

Karel Obluk, AVG’s Chief Scientist, said that people tend to underestimate the speed at which threats appear and disappear. “There’s more to do than calculate checksums,” he said. Also known as a hash sum, a checksum is a number generated by running a file through a tool designed to create checksums. The number is fixed, and changes if any of the data inside the file changes. A virus that alters a file will alter its checksum, so many antivirus programs today will generate checksums for every file on your hard drive, and then whitelist them unless it detects a change.

Obluk added that there are more than 40,000 new viruses a day. “We do keep up, but not by processing each and individual sample.” AVG’s automation takes over here, leaving about 50 samples per day per researcher. The company employs 25 analysts in Brno, and has five in China dedicated specifically to malware originating from there.

And make no mistake, the threat to your computer isn’t really about disrupting you or your life. The bad guys just want your CPU and bandwidth to make money. “A typical botnet can generate $11,000 per day, on less than 10,000 computers,” said Obluk. The business of being a bad guy is so lucrative, he added, that malware writers have taken out ads in online forums not just for engineers, but for user interface designers, office managers, and accountants.

AVG’s chief scientist, Karel Obluk. ‘The cyber criminals go for profit; it could equally be the whole economy or one country’s profit. When there were several spearheaded, targeted attacks against Boeing infrastructure, was that industrial espionage or cyber warfare?’

(Credit: Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

How the good guys stop the malware
The short version of how malware gets stopped from infecting your computer is quite simple, according to Pavel Krcma, the head of AVG’s virus lab. First, the virus sample gets collected. It comes either via a user submission, is picked up by AVG’s protection algorithm, or is shared from another virus labs. Whereas on the business and marketing side the security software industry can be brutal, the analysts and other members of the research and protection side communicate regularly, Krcma said.

Once the sample is in the lab, the next step is create a checksum signature for the sample. This then gets checked against the existing database of checksums to ensure that its not actually a legitimate file, known as a false positive.

Assuming it is malicious, the next step is a bit “like undressing the virus,” said Jirí Bracek, AVG’s director of Security Engineering. The easiest way to see whether a file contains malicious code is to create an entropy map of it, he said, but because the files are almost always encrypted they have to rely on an emulator.

“We put it in a 64-bit Windows emulator, and we have a script emulator. Mostly malware scripts are obfuscated, and it’s the obfuscation that prevents us from using hashes or regular expressions, so we use the emulator to reveal it,” he explained. Citing proprietary information, however, Bracek wouldn’t reveal precisely

how the emulator works.

Inside the file’s binary code there are three sections: A .text section for executable code, the part that sends instructions to the processor; the .data contains file data; and the .rsrc, which contains icons and other resources. “We can see healthy code in the binary because healthy code has uniform lengths of jumps, they are organized,” said Bracek. “Malware code sometimes has code in different sections, such as .reloc or .rsrc. Malware also has code with chaotic jumps.”

Once a file has been positively identified as a threat, the researcher generates a checksum for it and updates the database. The update then goes out to AVG’s more than 110 million active users.

All told, from the point that AVG receives a suspected new threat to the point where the malware is blocked and that data is pushed out to AVG users around the world, the process takes about five minutes, said Krcma. The analysts are quite adept at what they do, he added. “It takes about one minute per piece of malware.”

AVG wouldn’t let us show you screenshots of precisely how they take down a virus, but here’s the threat map that their analysts see.

(Credit: Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)

Not all threats can be detected using entropy maps. For example, rogue antivirus programs, also known as fake antiviruses, can’t be detected using entropy maps, because those kinds of threats behave normally. The recent MacDefender attack was a rogue antivirus. Bracek explained that for rogue antiviruses, AVG instead looks at the user interface characteristics, since those are more likely to stand out.

Where the threats come from
“About 10 percent of attacks are coming from USB sticks,” said Obluk, which leaves the Internet for the lion’s share. But what does that mean? AVG’s researchers are seeing a mixed bag of social engineering, rogue antiviruses, and traditional viruses and botnets.

Premium SMS is also a problem, and Obluk cited an AVG study that found that 8 percent of about 2,200 sampled U.S.-based smartphone users said premium SMS scams had happened to them. A premium SMS scam is where a rogue process gets your phone to send a text message to a number that charges for the receipt of the message. Premium SMS has been used to help donate money to victims of natural disasters and to relief organizations, but instead of a $10 donation, the premium SMS scammers use smaller denominations to avoid detection, Obluk said, because a $1 variance in your phone bill tends not to stand out to people the way a larger charge would.

Another big problem on smartphones, he said, is URL spoofing, because a phone’s smaller browser makes it harder to read the location bar.

But Obluk cautioned that socially engineered threats–the threats that con people into giving up sensitive data–are the hardest to prevent and the hardest to inculcate against. “Mac and Linux and Windows are generally secure. It’s usually the user that’s the weakest link.”

bluevertlgbar