Anonymous hacks Italy’s critical-national-IT protection

July 25th, 2011

Evidently the protection isn’t critical

By John LeydenGet more from this author

Hacktivists have posted “secret documents” stolen from an Italian cybercrime unit.

The documents – 8GB of files – were extracted from a system maintained by the Centro Nazionale Anticrimine Informatico per la Protezione delle Infrastrutture Critiche (CNAIPIC), the organisation charged with guarding the country’s critical IT infrastructure. In a message on Twitter announcing the release, Anonymous said it had received the files from an unnamed “source”, prior to posting a sample of the files onto Pastebin. “#AntiSec strikes at Italy Government. Silent no more,” it said.

The stolen documents reportedly include confidential data stored on servers that held evidence related to investigations as well as documents on the management structure of CNAIPIC and pictures of staff, among other files. Data on private firms including Gazprom and Exxon Mobil as well as foreign governments also appears to be among the cache.

Anonymous makes no direct mention on the motive for the attack, but it may well have been a retaliation to the arrests of alleged members of Anonymous in Italy earlier this month.

A story on the release can be found on The Hacker News here.

Hackers affiliated with the AntiSec movement have also hit GIS Austria, the Austrian TV licence fee collector. The organisation said 214,000 data files were swiped from its systems by Anonymous on Friday and that 96,000 of these had contained “account information”. The hack is under investigation and affected customers have been informed. GIS’s statement can be found here (in German). ®

Macs prone to hacking via battery —Report

July 25th, 2011

Are the batteries in Apple Inc.’s laptops too smart for their own good?

Security researcher Charlie Miller has found a potential security weakness that potentially allows a hacker to take control of a MacBook – or even have it explode.

“These batteries just aren’t designed with the idea that people will mess with them. What I’m showing is that it’s possible to use them to do something really bad,” Miller said, according to a blog post on Forbes.com.

Miller is currently a researcher with the consultancy Accuvant, Forbes said.

Laptop batteries contain a microcontroller that monitors the power level and lets the laptop’s operating system and charger respond appropriately.

Such microcontrollers can even regulate the heat they generate.

But Miller said that when he examined batteries in several Macbooks, Macbook Pros and Macbook Airs, he found the batteries’ chips are shipped with default passwords.

Potentially, he said anyone who discovers that password and learns to control the chips’ firmware can use the batteries to hack into the MacBooks.

Miller said he plans to expose and provide a fix for a potential attack using the microchips that control their batteries, at a Black Hat security conference in August.

That includes “permanently ruining batteries at will, and may enable nastier tricks like implanting them with hidden malware that infects the computer no matter how many times software is reinstalled or even potentially causing the batteries to heat up, catch fire or explode,” Forbes said.

He also said he plans to release a tool for Apple users, “Caulkgun,” that changes the battery firmware’s passwords to a random string.

Miller also sent Apple and Texas Instruments his research to inform them of the vulnerability, although he has yet to get a reply from Apple.

“No one has ever thought of this as a security boundary,” says Miller. “It’s hard to know for sure everything someone could do with this.”

Criminal potential

Forbes quoted Miller as saying one can install persistent malware on the chip that infects the rest of the computer to steal data, control its functions, or cause it to crash.

“You could put a whole hard drive in, reinstall the software, flash the BIOS, and every time it would reattack and screw you over. There would be no way to eradicate or detect it other than removing the battery,” he said.

He said few IT administrators would think to check a battery’s firmware for the source of that infection.

Worse, the chip could re-infect the computer again and again if it is not discovered.

Blowing up

Forbes said that the disturbing prospect of a hacker remotely blowing up a battery on command may be possible.

Miller said that while the batteries he examined have safeguards against explosions, having a battery blow up on command might still be possible.

“You read stories about batteries in electronic devices that blow up without any interference. If you have all this control, you can probably do it,” he said.

Analyzing software updates

Miller discovered two passwords in accessing and altering Apple batteries by analyzing a software update Apple instituted in 2009 to address a problem with Macbook batteries.

He reverse-engineered the firmware and found how to rewrite the firmware to do whatever he wanted. — TJD, GMA News

Credit: http://www.gmanews.tv/story/227329/technology/macs-prone-to-hacking-via-battery-report

Read about hacks? Think you’re immune? Think again

July 7th, 2011

(Reuters) – While the big news is about hacks into the CIA’s and Senate’s public websites, Citigroup and Lockheed Martin, tens of thousands of people are victimized by cyber criminals each year, sometimes with devastating effect.

The FBI, which has a special Internet fraud center, received more than 25,000 complaints a month last year from people who were defrauded over the Internet by fake companies which offered to sell goods that never arrived, by people whose identities were stolen and by victims scammed by someone who claimed to be an FBI agent.

Victims lost hundreds of millions of dollars, according to the FBI’s Internet fraud report for 2010.

The conventional view of hackers as pimply faced, isolated young men out to harmlessly joyride some big company’s servers is out of date, despite the presence of groups such as Anonymous and Lulz Security, which strike for fun and political reasons.

The more worrisome hackers are crime rings in Asia and Eastern Europe or elsewhere beyond the easy reach of the law, where hackers may use a wireless connection in a Russian library to avoid detection.

These are the individuals who steal personal information, like names, addresses, dates of birth and email addresses. They then sell that information to thieves in Internet chat rooms. Those thieves often round out what they know about victims from Facebook pages — maybe a birthplace from a Facebook quiz — or other social media.

Maybe they’ll send a phishing email, pretending to know the victims. Or maybe they’ll send them something they might like because they have found out, for example, that they have a Sony PlayStation and were born in 1943.

But that game download for a grandchild could include key-logging software that secretly tells thieves what victims type. Perhaps they’ll use that to find out which banks they use, and their user names and passwords.

Some advice:

_ Limit information on Facebook and other social media. “Citizens need to start recognizing the value of their own personal data and not put out any data that isn’t necessary,” said U.S. Representative Jim Langevin, a co-founder of the Congressional Cyber Security Caucus.

_ Have solid Internet computer security software and update it monthly. Word to the wise: porn sites are notoriously loaded with viruses.

“Don’t click on links in spam messages and be extra suspicious of messages that piggyback on recent hot news items or events such as holidays,” says Joris Evers, a spokesman for McAfee Inc.

_ Some security experts advise against clicking in links in any email, no matter what the source.

_ Use strong passwords, which means a password that is long and has a mix of letters, numbers and symbols. A strong password is especially important for financial transactions.

Jim Lewis, a cyber expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said he does frequent sweeps of his computer using different security software.

“I do not use computers that my children use for my financial transactions,” said Lewis. “I change passwords and user names very frequently, not that that’s perfect.”

There are efforts to combat spam and phishing attacks.

Many Internet service providers identify and stop spam — estimated to be 90 percent of Internet traffic — before it reaches an inbox. But they only get a percentage.

Comcast, a major Internet service provider, reaches out to customers who have been contacted by potential criminals to warn them, said Jay Opperman, Comcast’s senior director of security and privacy.

“Our customers are very happy with the fact that we’re proactive,” he said. “Overwhelmingly, they’re like ‘Wow, I didn’t know. Thanks for letting me know.’”

TDL-4: The ‘indestructible’ botnet?

June 30th, 2011

Security researchers at Kaspersky Lab have detailed a new botnet–a collection of infected computers controlled by cybercriminals–called TDL-4, that might just be “indestructible.”

TDL-4 gets its name by being the fourth generation of the botnet. In 2008, the original TDL appeared. It has been altered over the last several years. With TDL-4, Kaspersky has found, the malware creators have drastically improved the botnet over its predecessors.

“The malware writers extended the program functionality, changed the algorithm used to encrypt the communication protocol between bots and the botnet command and control servers, and attempted to ensure they had access to infected computers even in cases where the botnet control centers are shut down,” Kaspersky wrote on its SecureList blog earlier this week. “The owners of TDL are essentially trying to create an ‘indestructible’ botnet that is protected against attacks, competitors, and antivirus companies.”

Central to TDL-4′s updates is an improved algorithm that encrypts communications between infected computers and the botnet’s command. According to Kaspersky, TDL-4 creates an identifier known as “bsh parameter” that “acts as one of the encryption keys for subsequent connections to the command and control server.” Once a request between command and the computer is activated, it’s transmitted over an HTTPS connection. According to Kaspersky, that system helps the botnet “run smoothly” and, at the same time, stops anyone else from trying to take control over it.

Global distribution of TDL-4 infections.Global distribution of TDL-4 infections. According to the country codes to the right, the U.S., India, Indonesia, and Great Britain are tops in infections, according to Kaspersky.

(Credit: Kaspersky Lab)

To help safeguard itself from removal, TDL-4 infects a computer’s master boot record, thus allowing it to run before the operating system starts up, and keep it away from the prying eyes of anti-malware programs. What’s more, the botnet deletes other malicious files that might get caught by security tools and tip users to TDL-4 running on their computers. In their place, TDL-4 has downloaded about 30 malicious programs on infected computers, including “fake anti-virus programs, adware, and the Pushdo spambot,” Kaspersky says.

According to Kaspersky, the botnet also uses peer-to-peer network Kad to issue several commands, including searching for new files, publishing files to Kad, and more.

The big upshot of that for TDL-4 creators, Kaspersky says, is that even if “its command and control centers are shut down, the botnet owners will not lose control over infected machines,” since they’ll still be able to access Kad.

Although Kaspersky believes TDL-4 is practically impenetrable, not everyone is so quick to agree. Writing for InfoWorld today, Roger Grimes, a self-described “24-year veteran of the malware wars,” says that there has yet to be a single threat that has been able to hold its ground indefinitely.

“I can safely tell you that no threat has appeared that the antimalware industry and OS vendors did not successfully respond to,” Grimes writes. “It may take months or years to kill off something, but eventually the good guys get it right.”

He makes a solid point. Last year, Conficker was taken down after wreaking havoc on computers worldwide since 2008. Earlier this month, the FBI announced that it had taken down the Coreflood botnet.

But TDL-4′s functionality might just be in a league of its own. As Kaspersky notes, the botnet can “manipulate adware and search engines, provide anonymous Internet access, and act as a launch pad for other malware.”

According to Kaspersky, 28 percent of all infected TDL-4 computers are in the U.S. Computers in the U.K., Italy, France, and many other countries are also infected with TDL-4. All told, more than 4.5 million computers were infected with TDL-4 in the first three months of 2011 alone.

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, posting at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Scareware and How to Avoid It

June 24th, 2011

copyright: http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2011/06/24/scareware-and-how-to-avoid-it/?mod=google_news_blog#

By Nick Clayton

The idea behind “scareware” is to frighten computer users into paying to download anti-virus software of dubious, if any, value. It can be enormously profitable which means its methodology is increasingly sophisticated.

“The people behind scareware have learned a great deal from the anti-virus industry and vice versa. It’s a copycat business,” said Richard Clooke, review program manager at PC Tools, a division of Symantec Corporation.

A common sales strategy used by legitimate businesses was, for instance, to persuade computer users to have their machines scanned online for free. They would then have to pay for software to clean up any infections. Of course, almost all computer owners would only have the vendors’ word for the existence of viruses and their removal.

That is where scareware comes in. Rather than waiting for a customer to visit a site to try and clean-up a perceived problem, scareware pops up a warning on the user’s screen. This can appear totally legitimate. In recent weeks the Firefox browser and Apple computers through MacDefender software have been the subject of scareware alerts.

To generate these alerts, users do not have to do anything stupid. Malicious code can be concealed on legitimate sites and so-called “drive-by attacks” mean visitors can generate pop-ups without clicking on anything.

“Another common tactic of fake anti-virus attackers is to ‘poison’ search engines with results that point to web pages that contain scareware. These attackers have created elaborate scripts and programs that actually use real-time trending information derived from search engines to create fake web pages containing the trending topic, but that also contain scareware.

“These fake pages then get indexed by search engines and appear in search results for legitimate timely topics. For example, earlier this year, the topics relating to the Japan earthquake and tsunami disaster, and Osama Bin Laden’s death were heavily utilized by fake anti-virus groups to ‘promote’ their scareware,” said Mike Paquette, chief strategy officer at network security company Correro.

The authors of scareware have also become increasingly adept at persuading people to buy useless or malicious programs when they see the warnings: “They’re forcing you to make an error of judgment,” said Sencer Parker of security company websense.

“They use three main mechanisms: First, there’s the visceral influence of that big flashing warning symbol on your screen.

“Second, they provoke a failure of self-regulation because of the pressure of that sign and things such as the fear of losing credit card details.

“Thirdly, there’s authority. The user thinks: ‘I’ve got an anti-virus company, who must know more than I do about these things, warning me I’ve got to take action now.’”

Under this carefully-orchestrated pressure it’s not surprising so many people are fooled into handing over their credit card details. “The main thing to look for is these scareware warnings are very much more aggressive than you’d get from any legitimate anti-virus company,” said Orla Cox of security company Symantec’s response centre.

Equally, legitimate companies do not scan a machine without asking. “The main thing is not to panic. Even if you have downloaded something it is unlikely the damage cannot be repaired,” she said.

The trick is often to Google any information such as the name of the scareware company or the wording of the warning. This will usually turn up advice and programs, which are almost always free, from legitimate vendors which will enable the computer to be repaired. If the original infected machine will not connect to the internet, as is quite common, the clean-up program can be downloaded to a memory stick.

bluevertlgbar