More “scareware” – no kidding, right?

April 9th, 2009

It’s a good thing we have Microsoft around to tell us that there is more scareware floating about the web. I published a post on AV360 early in March, but this is hardly the only incarnation of so-called “rogue security software.”

The idea behind scareware is to scare users into registering software (and usually paying for it) to protect themselves from malware infections. Unfortunately, the software for which they are paying is malware itself. No matter how many times I tell people about this problem of nearly epidemic proportions, though, teachers invariably find ways to get themselves infected.

As a number of bloggers and journalists have pointed out, the massive publicity surrounding the Conficker worm has made people hypersensitive to the idea of malware on their computers and more than happy to believe it when apparent security software tells them they’re infected.

Interestingly, according to the report and ChannelWeb,

Also in the report, Microsoft blamed third-party applications — and not Windows — for the majority of the security-related issues in its operating systems.

The Security Intelligence Report found that as software companies have improved the security of their operating systems, attackers have begun en masse to target the application layer. Nearly 90 percent of the reported attacks exploiting vulnerabilities from July to December 2008 were aimed at applications.

What does this mean for us? Obviously it means gateway-level AV is a must, as is client-level AV since so many users take their computers home. More importantly, though, it means that we will be able to rely less and less on Mac and Linux operating systems to ensure security. Cross-platform applications will increasingly make all operating systems vulnerable and malware distributors are finding increasingly creative ways to infect our machines.

The most important message, though? We need to train all of our users, whether teachers, students, or staff. What antivirus are you using in your school? Users need to know that messages from other sources (e.g., not Norton, Clamwin, McAffee, or whatever you’re using) claiming malware infections means that they should call tech support, not start clicking. Finally,

Meanwhile, researchers say that users should avoid opening attachments or clicking on links in e-mail or IM from unknown or untrusted sources.

It sounds simple, but training is the key here. We are in education, right? We need to educate all of our users on a continual basis.

Christopher Dawson

Follow Chris Dawson on Twitter! Christopher Dawson is the technology director for the Athol-Royalston School District in northern Massachusetts. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations, but always keep in mind that the opinions expressed here are his own and not those of his daytime employer, even if he talks incessantly about his day job.

Email Christopher Dawson

Fear of viruses could be causing PC attacks: report

April 8th, 2009

By Bill Rigby


SEATTLE (Reuters) – Computer users’ growing fear of worms and viruses could be behind a recent spike in attacks on PCs via bogus security software, according to a Microsoft Corp report published on Wednesday.


As the Conficker worm and other malicious software — known as malware — have grabbed headlines, more computer users have been looking for security programs online, some of which turn out to be agents for viruses themselves.


Out of hundreds of millions of PCs monitored by the world’s largest software maker for its twice yearly Security Intelligence Report, seven of the 25 top security threats came in the form of fake security programs.


In the last six months of 2008, Microsoft said it cleared 4.4 million PCs of the most successful bogus security program, which goes under the name of Win32/Renos.


That is a 67 percent increase over the first half of 2008, said George Stathakopoulos, head of product security at Microsoft’s Trustworthy Computing Group.


Fear of Conficker “could be a part of it,” said Stathakopoulos, explaining the sudden jump in attacks from what Microsoft calls “rogue” security software, or “scareware”.


According to the report, more security-conscious consumers are being tricked by insistent or alarming pop-up warnings into paying for protection which, unknown to them, is actually malware designed to steal personal information.


The phenomenon of “scareware” is a headache for bona fide security software makers such as Symantec Corp, McAfee Inc and Trend Micro Inc.


But these companies in turn have played a role in raising fears about malware such as Conficker, and have reaped a windfall from worried computer users buying their products.


Conficker, a program that works its way into a PC and allows it to be controlled remotely, is believed to have infected millions of PCs, but no significant disruption has yet occurred.


Overall, Microsoft’s report shows that instances of software security problems — what it calls “unique vulnerability disclosures” — actually fell 3 percent in the second half of last year from the first half. But the number defined as “high severity” rose 4 percent.


The report only reflects PCs using Microsoft systems, and does not include Linux operating systems or Apple Inc computers.


The report, and guidance on how to avoid viruses, is available at www.microsoft.com/sir.


(Reporting by Bill Rigby, editing by Leslie Gevirtz)


Microsoft warns of dangerous rise in scareware

April 8th, 2009

Criminals continuing to extort money from vulnerable users

Phil Muncaster

scarewareThe threat of rogue security software, or ’scareware’, has risen dramatically over the past year or so, according to a new report from Microsoft, but there was good news for the industry after a fall in the number of vulnerability disclosures.

Scareware is used by criminals to extort money from vulnerable users by persuading them that their PC is at risk or infected, and urging them to buy bogus security software.

The Microsoft Security Intelligence Report Volume 6 claimed that these threats are now among the most prevalent in the computing world.

The report highlighted Win32/FakeXPA and Win32/FakeSecSen, which Microsoft has detected on more than 1.5 million computers, pushing them into the top 10 threats in the second half of the year.

Win32/Renos, meanwhile, which is used to deliver rogue security software, was detected on 4.4 million unique computers, an increase of 66.6 per cent over the first half of 2008.

“The criminals are playing on people’s fears. People are aware of security, and these guys want to prey on that,” said Microsoft security and privacy lead Cliff Evans.

“We are not seeing a whole new attack vector, but things are changing. There is a different emphasis on rogue software now, and a shift from operating system to third-party application vulnerabilities.”

This continuing trend of attacking the application layer means that users should always keep application versions up to date, apply new patches as soon as possible and keep anti-malware software current, Evans advised.

While the “vast majority” of corporates understand the importance of these precautions, education is still required for many consumers who do not understand the value of automatic updates and the like, according to Microsoft chief security advisor Ed Gibson.

“The report shows again that, because of the steps we’re taking to make the operating systems more secure, and working with partners and suppliers to improve their [security] processes, [criminal] organisations are moving towards the weakest link: you and me,” he said.

There was a note of optimism in the report, however. Industry-wide figures for unique vulnerability disclosures were down by 12 per cent from 2007, while high severity vulnerabilities were down 16 per cent.

Graham Titterington of analyst firm Ovum agreed that the drive to improve standards is having an effect on the quality of applications and systems being built.

“To win the battle IT systems need to be engineered to be significantly less vulnerable, and we are making progress on that,” he explained. “Much is being done to improve the standards in the engineering of systems and security products.”

Jay Abbott, threat and vulnerability leader at consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers, praised Microsoft for the work it had done in improving the security of its products. But he warned that major risks still exist in web applications and browsers.

“People are focused on delivering the product, and security is a secondary problem so the code is often weak,” he said. “Certainly we need better coding practices, but even secure code can have holes picked in it.”

Credit Due: http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2240101/microsoft-warns-rise-scareware

bluevertlgbar