Hackers Take Over Hundreds of Facebook Groups

November 10th, 2009

by Larry Seltzer

A group of hackers (or perhaps just one, but they are identifying themselves as “we”) have taken control of hundreds of Facebook groups. Thanks to the loose wire blog for pointing out this problem. The hackers explain how they did it on their web site. Click the nearby image to see a full-size image of a hijacked group.

The groups all display the same graphic and the description has been changed to the announcement of what they have done and what their intentions are:

Hello, we hereby announce that we have officially hijacked your Facebook group.

This means we control a certain part of the information about you on Facebook. If we wanted we could make you appear in a bad way which could damage your image severly [sic].

For example we could rename your group and call it something very inappropriate and nasty, like “I support pedophile’s rights”. But have no fear – we won’t. We just renamed it Control Your Info. Because this is really all we want:

Think about the safety in your social media life to the same extent you do in your real life.

Watch the videoclip for more information or check out www.controlyour.info for more tips soon!

We promise to restore your group name and leave the group by the end of next week. Don’t worry – we won’t mess anything up.

Best regards

/controlyour.info

All members of the group get a message as well.

The hackers are presenting this stunt as a public service, but it’s not the right way to go about things.

Originally posted to the PCMag.com security blog, Security Watch.

The end of US Internet freedom looms

November 4th, 2009
All in the fine print

WHILE MANY HAVE WELCOMED the unfettered reign of the Internet service providers (ISPs) coming to an end in the US in favour of network neutrality, a team of learned legal minds has warned that all might not be as it seems.

The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has decided that it will police the Internet to make sure that the large ISPs – telecom and cable companies, mostly – do not force a two-tiered Internet on the American public.

However a group of prominent law professors has warned the FCC that buried in the fine print of its proposed Net Neutrality rules are potential loopholes that if left open could be exploited by the ISPs in connivance with the entertainment cartels to undermine the future of Internet freedom.

Columbia University Law School professor and Free Press board chair Tim Wu told the Washington Post about the letter (PDF) after submitting it to the FCC.

Wu’s co-authors included Stanford Law professor Barbara van Shewick, Harvard Law professor Larry Lessig, Yale Law School’s Jack Balkin, South Texas College of Law professor John Blevins and University of Louisville School of Law’s Jim Chen.

They said that the FCC’s proposed rules don’t sufficiently define what the commission means by its use of the terms “non-discrimination” and “reasonable network management”.

The law professors agree that the FCC should police the ISPs, but it wants them to have a set of rules that the telecoms and cable firms can’t slip out of like the slippery eels that they are.

Using these loopholes the ISPs could block subscribers in the same way that occurred in 2007 when Comcast secretly blocked and stifled its customers’ Internet access, effectively preventing or hindering subscribers’ use of filesharing applications such as Bit Torrent, the letter warns.

If ISPs have too much leeway that will effectively eliminate Net Neutrality, so it is important that the FCC should be clear as to what it believes the standards should be, they wrote.

Indeed, the devil is in the details, we reckon, so it will be crucial that the FCC get this right.

Microsoft Exec Backs Off Windows 7 ‘Hack’ Comment

November 3rd, 2009

By Kevin McLaughlin, ChannelWeb

windows7A Microsoft (NSDQ:MSFT) executive whose pointed comments on Windows 7 upgrades have irked Microsoft bloggers has apologized. Well, in a roundabout sort of way, that is.

In a Monday blog post, Eric Ligman, global partner experience lead in Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Group, said his now-infamous blog post titled “Regardless of what any hack says, a Windows 7 upgrade is an upgrade” wasn’t aimed at Microsoft bloggers, but at technical workarounds that make it possible to clean install Windows 7 using upgrade media.

“So for anyone out there thinking my post was trying to ‘make an example’ of someone as a ‘hack’ or that I was calling someone specifically a ‘hack,’ sorry to disappoint you,” Ligman wrote in the blog post.

For the past several months, Windows 7 testers have been asking Microsoft for technical details on Windows 7 upgrades but the company hasn’t responded. So some Microsoft bloggers have developed workarounds for clean installing Windows 7 using upgrade media, something Microsoft says is illegal if a machine doesn’t have an existing version of Windows installed.

Ligman, as the public face of Microsoft’s Byzantine software licensing program, has been particularly vocal about the consequences of using improperly licensed software, often invoking the specter of Business Software Alliance audits and other legal troubles.

Some media reports have assumed Ligman’s “hack” reference was to Paul Thurrott of the Supersite For Windows blog, who published details on the Windows 7 upgrade workaround last week. Ed Bott, another noted Microsoft blogger, has also called out Microsoft over the issue. So have dozens of posters who’ve left comments on Ligman’s Microsoft SMB Community blog.

But Ligman insists he wasn’t using the term “hack” in a pejorative sense. “There appears to be a lot of reading through ‘pre-determined conclusion’ lenses,” Ligman wrote in the blog post.

Although Ligman is downplaying the issue, Thurrott sees it as an example of Microsoft’s heavy-handed approach to software licensing and its tendency to punish its body of customers for the actions of a few software pirates.

“This is very much about how Microsoft communicates with his customers, and while Ligman tries to make the case that Microsoft cares very much about its customers, this little episode is telling them otherwise,” Thurrott wrote in a Monday blog post .

The good news is that the Windows 7 upgrade kerfluffle has led to a great deal of feedback that Ligman says he has shared with higher-ups.

“I have submitted your various comments on this topic to the appropriate people for that topic and will be happy (believe me) to post the exact link to where you should go for this information as soon as I hear back,” Ligman wrote.

NSA To Build $1.5 Billion Cybersecurity Data Center

November 2nd, 2009
nsa_sealThe massive complex, comprising up to 1.5 million square feet of building space, will provide intelligence and warnings related to cybersecurity threats across government.

By InformationWeek October 29, 2009 01:07 PM

The National Security Agency, whose job it is to protect national security systems, will soon break ground on a data center in Utah that’s budgeted to cost $1.5 billion. Juniper CEO Kevin Johnson talks about how traffic is increasing at a faster rate than the number of users and how the model will not scale. He notes the need for new business models and an increase in innovation. The NSA is building the facility to provide intelligence and warnings related to cybersecurity threats, cybersecurity support to defense and civilian agency networks, and technical assistance to the Department of Homeland Security, according to a transcript of remarks by Glenn Gaffney, deputy director of national intelligence for collection, who is responsible for oversight of cyber intelligence activities in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

“Our country must continue to advance its national security efforts and that includes improvements in cybersecurity,” Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, said in a statement. “As we rely more and more on our communications networks for business, government and everyday use, we must be vigilant and provide agencies with the necessary resources to protect our country from a cyber attack.”

The data center will be built at Camp Williams, a National Guard training center 26 miles south of Salt Lake City, which was chosen for its access to cheap power, communications infrastructure, and availability of space, Gaffney said. The complex will comprise up to 1.5 million square feet of building space on 120 to 200 acres, according to the NBC affiliate in Salt Lake City.

According to a budget document for the project, the 30-megawatt data center will be cooled by chilled water and capable of Tier 3, or near carrier-grade, reliability. The design calls for the highest LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standard within available resources.

The U.S. Army Corps of engineers will host a conference in Salt Lake City to provide further detail the data center building and acquisition plans. The project will require between 5,000 and 10,000 workers during construction, and the data center will eventually employ between 100 and 200 workers.

As part of its mission, NSA monitors communications “signals” for intelligence related to national security and defense. Gaffney gave assurances that the work going on at the data center will protect civil liberties. “We will accomplish this in full compliance with the U.S. Constitution and federal law and while observing strict guidelines that protect the privacy and civil liberties of the American people,” Gaffney said.

On Nov. 30, the Department of Homeland Security will formally open a new cybersecurity operations center, the National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center, in Arlington, Va. The facility will house the National Cyber Security Center, which coordinates cybersecurity operations across government, the National Coordinating Center for Telecommunications, which operates the government’s telecommunications network, and the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team, which works with industry and government to protect networks and alert them of malicious activity.

InformationWeek Analytics has published a report on the 10 steps to effective data classification. Download the report here (registration required).


Windows 7 Upgrade Woes Mount: Endless Reboots and Product Key Problems

October 26th, 2009

Jacqueline Emigh


Oct 26, 2009 1:42 pm

Call it the legacy of Microsoft’s Vista operating system. PC users upgrading from Windows Vista to Windows 7 have run into a variety of hair pulling problems since last Thursday when Windows 7 launched. Complaints range from endless reboots to refusals by Windows to accept Microsoft’s assigned product keys.

As of Monday morning, Microsoft had answered about 2600 questions that poured into support forum regarding upgrades. At last count, around 1400 questions remained unanswered.

Unable to Unpack

windows 7 upgrade

On Microsoft’s support forum, users are complaining of receiving “unspecified errors” when unpacking Windows 7 Home Premium from the student download, and about getting the error message “We are unable to create or save new files in the folder in which this application was downloaded.”

The problem was traced back to the third-party software distributor who was offering the upgrade download for Windows 7. It has to do with the way the files were downloaded to users’ PCs. Microsoft has acknowledged the problem and suggests this work-around.

Endless Reboots

Users began to complain about endless reboots on Friday, posting messages to the Microsoft suwindows 7pport forums stating that the Windows 7 upgrade would hang two-thirds of the way through the upgrade. Microsoft says it is investigating user problems regarding “endless reboots,” but downplayed them as “isolated issues,” according to reports.

Here is a sample complaint from the forums:

“On the last step of the upgrade (transferring files/programs/etc.), my laptop rebooted and came to a screen telling me the upgrade was unsuccessful and my previous [Vista] OS files would now be restored. My laptop is now in what seems to be a loop of restarting and trying to restore the files,” wrote one user, JSchneider21.

Did Microsoft know about the reboot problems? In July Microsoft posted a document on its Web site outlining the problem and suggesting steps that users can take to address it.

Product Key Problems

Other angry users are saying that Windows won’t accept product keys supplied with Windows 7 upgrade disks. “The product key is not valid. Please retype the product key,” Windows 7 tells them.

Meanwhile, many users seem quite dissatisfied with Microsoft’s responses to other Winwindows 7 bugs 7 upgrade issues. As of this morning, Microsoft support reps were still replying to users’ questions about product keys with a canned response citing “several reasons why a product key might not be accepted.”

Essentially, either, “You mistyped it. The product key you typed doesn’t match the key assigned to Windows on your computer. Microsoft has identified the product key you entered as counterfeit,” or “the product key has already been used on another computer,” according to Microsoft.

One person griped: “I Have been on the phone since 4 pm EST and I still don’t have a valid product code. Thank you Microsoft! Thank you for wasting my valuable time! Time is money and this had been a flagrant waste of it,” wrote thatguy38.

Users helping out other users on the Microsoft support forums are suggesting a common mistake is leading to upgrade product key problems. Forum users suggest product key rejections stem from users mistakenly wiping their system clean and trying to use an upgrade Windows 7 disk for a full installation. It is unclear whether this is indeed the source to user aggravation.

Users have been posting their own, rather convoluted workarounds to the product key conundrum on the Microsoft forum. But wouldn’t it be great if Microsoft would give them a simpler answer?

Credit Due: http://www.pcworld.com/article/174342/windows_7_upgrade_woes_mount_endless_reboots_and_product_key_problems.html

bluevertlgbar